Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

A smorgasbord of fat studies look at why we overeat

July 13th 2009 21:29
Why are we fat?
Signature Tune









What makes us get fat?

We all know that obesity results when we eat more calories than we burn on a regular basis.

But that simplistic formula misses some of the dietary and metabolic nuances.


Some of us overeat and never seem to gain a pound; others count every calorie and still battle the bulge. Some folks are done in by a sweet tooth, some favor carbs and some happily subsist on the salad bar.

So, scientists are constantly on the lookout for explanations of why our omnivorous species eats so differently from person to person.

Here's a buffet sampling of some recent findings on why we eat as we do:

• Blame what Mom ate. Researchers at Rockefeller University in New York City reported on a rat study last fall that found when a mother eats a high-fat diet during pregnancy, it produces brain changes in her offspring that stimulate the appetite - and lead to overeating and obesity early in life.

• Tonsils keep us thin. Dutch researchers reported last month that children who have their tonsils surgically removed, with or without their adenoids, are at increased risk for becoming overweight or obese by the time they're 8. The doctors suspect that kids with frequent tonsil infections have somewhat stunted growth and that once the tonsils are removed, they experience "catch-up" growth that can get out of control.


• Ear infections make us fat. Scientists at the University of Florida found that middle-aged adults with a history of middle ear infections tend to be overweight more than similar adults with no history of infections. They suspect that damage to a nerve that passes through the middle ear - the chorda tympani - intensifies the desire for fatty, high-energy foods.

• Obesity numbs the tongue. Penn State researchers reported last fall that obesity in lab rats gradually numbs their sensitivity to sweet foods and prompts them to consume larger and ever-sweeter meals to get the same feeling of reward. As in obese humans, the researchers say extra weight decreases the amount of dopamine in the brain, a key signal in the brain's pleasure system.

• Gut hormones make food look better. Canadian researchers last fall reported brain imaging studies on humans that showed reward centers in their brains responded more strongly to pictures of food when the subjects have received an infusion of the appetite hormone ghrelin. Other studies had shown that it activated eating through the brain's command center. But the new research found the hormone affects many brain regions related to reward, motivation, even visual processing and memory of what foods were displayed.

• Junk food makes kids happy. Taiwanese and U.S. scientists reported earlier this month on a study of more than 2,300 kids in Taiwan between 2 and 12 years of age. While those who ate more burgers, pizza and fries and soft drives were more likely to be overweight, they were less likely to feel unhappy, sad or depressed. So, scientists argue, programs aimed at reducing childhood obesity have to find not only alternative foods, but also alternative ways to promote positive feelings in the kids.

• Fast food may not be worse than sit-down-restaurant food. Purdue University scientists analyzed data from an Agriculture Department survey and found that any meal eaten out is likely to be bigger and have more calories than a home-cooked meal, but that fast food meals tend to be smaller, and thus have fewer calories, than the average meal from a table-service restaurant. Trouble is, people eating sit-down tend to cut back on food consumption the rest of the day, while those dining from the counter or drive-through do not. Total intake may be the same either way.

• See the good, pick the bad. Researchers from the City University of New York and several other institutions presented several studies that show when people are given choices that include a healthy option, like a salad, they're actually more likely to go for a less healthy alternative, like fries. The selection patterns were actually more pronounced in people who have relatively high levels of self-control.

"Just because we consumers want to see healthier items available does not mean that we are going to choose them," the authors wrote.

So blame it on your mom, or your ghrelin.




This article is from the US daily herald click here for the link






93
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
4 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Wynona Lavota

July 13th 2009 22:30
lol, I like the title of this post. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm feeling a bit peckish...

Comment by signals

July 13th 2009 22:45

Comment by Lara M

July 14th 2009 00:15
Interesting. I can some real-life truth in most of them, especially the last one

Comment by katyzzz

July 14th 2009 20:59
Wynona, signals and Lara, the delights of eating always has an instant appeal, but eating is far better than anorexia, don't you think?

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
24 Posts
37 Posts
38 Posts
5439 Posts dating from November 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by katyzzz
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]